Prenatal Downs Diagnosis: Cusp Of A Breakthrough

Until now, prenatal diagnosis of Downs syndromeEight of the mothers had their blood samples taken in
(Trisomy 21) for the unborn baby has required anthe first trimester (13 weeks or below).
invasive test. This has taken the form of anThe breakthrough was that they managed to
amniocentesis where fluid is taken from around thesuccessfully identify and separate the small amount
fetus in the womb after 14 weeks of gestation. Theof fetal DNA that cross into the maternal circulation.
alternative, available about 3 weeks earlier is CVSThis was analyzed via what are known as SNP (single
where a tiny piece of the afterbirth (placenta) isnucleotide polymorphisms) tests to identify where
extracted.there was an extra chromosome on set No. 21
Screening Tests(Trisomy 21).
The screening tests which are non-invasive haveTheir tests in this study correctly identified 58 of the
varying degrees of detection rates from a lowly60 chromosomal make up. Among the 58 correctly
30% for maternal age alone to a clearly impressiveanalyzed, two had Trisomy 21 (Downs). The two
85% for a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchalthat were not correctly analyzed included one who
translucency (scan) and maternal serum biochemistryhad Downs but labeled as normal (false negative) and
at 11-14 weeks. This is called the Integrated Test.the other one was incorrectly identified to have
Research has also shown that fetuses affected byDowns syndrome (false positive).
Downs syndrome have a missing nasal bone on anWhat does this imply?
ultrasound scan performed at 11-14 weeks. This testThis is potentially quite a major advance. Its strength
alone has been shown to identify around 70% oflies in the fact that it does away with an invasive
Downs syndrome babies. Crucially however, it did notprocedure therefore eliminating in a stroke the
appear to give any advantage over the longerspectre of miscarriage that hangs over the currently
established nuchal translucency scan performed atused procedures. This risk is indeed small but quite
the same gestation and therefore the uptake hasreal and when it occurs, is devastating.
been poor.However, it is important to stress that this is only an
One of the most frustrating weaknesses of allearly stage of this potential breakthrough. Here are
screening tests is the fact that they also falselythe facts:
detect unaffected babies, occasionally leading to The study had quite a small sample (60)
unnecessary invasive diagnostic tests and alwaysand it is therefore crucial that it is replicated in larger
causing significant stress to prospective parents. Thestudies.
false positive rate of screening tests is around 5%. There is still a lot of room for refinement.
Moreover, even the most sensitive screening test willIn this study, whilst the earliest sample was taken at
still miss some babies that are affected and for all8 weeks gestation, the first case of Downs was
parents this means a little seed of doubt until theidentified at just over 17 weeks. For this to be truly
baby arrives.useful, it will have to have the ability to establish the
Diagnostic Testsdiagnosis early, ideally in the first trimester. Also the
The definitive diagnostic tests mentionedinterval between blood sample collection and getting
(amniocentesis and CVS) suffer from one Achillesthe results need to be reasonably short, lasting no
heel: They are invasive and therefore carry themore than 2 or 3 weeks.
potential risk of provoking miscarriage. This can The current diagnostic tests have quite a
happen regardless of whether the baby is affectedhigh 99% accuracy rate. This test will need to match
by Downs syndrome or not. Because of this, therethat and ideally surpass it.
has been a lot of research activity to find a risk-freeScience research thrives on this kind of challenge and
reliable diagnostic prenatal test for Downs Syndrome.there is a lot of excitement in the medical research
This is why the recent announcement of aworld about this potential breakthrough.
development of such a test reported in the medicalIn fact, this research work by Ravgen Inc. in the
journal The Lancet (Feb. 3, 2007) has caused such aUnited States is not the only current development in
stir.this area. Researchers in Hong Kong are also
Maternal Blood Testreportedly on the verge of a similar breakthrough but
Dr Ravinder Dhallan of Ravgen Inc. has reportedemploying a different method which utilises placental
results of a study to diagnose Downs syndrome forDNA in maternal circulation.
the unborn baby using Maternal blood and thereforeThese methods might usher in a new era of safe
practically eliminating the potential risk of miscarriageand effective prenatal diagnostic tests. If the hurdles
associated with the available invasive tests. What Drare overcome, the rough estimate is that the tests
Dhallan and colleagues did in this study was to collectmay be available for use in about three years.
blood from 60 mothers whose median age was 34.