| Evolution is not necessarily incompatible
| |
| | evolution transformed one species into
|
| with the verse "In the beginning God
| |
| | another on the genetic level.The problem
|
| created heaven and earth." Its problem
| |
| | with Darwinian evolution is not that it's
|
| lies more with the notion that in the
| |
| | incompatible with faith in God. The
|
| beginning (of the theory of evolution)
| |
| | problem is that it's incompatible with
|
| Darwin knew nothing about genetics.Modern
| |
| | science. And we're not yet even talking
|
| science has shown that random genetic
| |
| | about complexities and design. We're
|
| mutation (which can be caused by
| |
| | talking about how random genetic changes
|
| carcinogenic chemicals, radioactivity,
| |
| | could have produced a vast majority of
|
| and sunlight, for example) is a highly
| |
| | healthy life forms with such a relatively
|
| destructive process. It can result in
| |
| | negligible number of deformed ones (even
|
| diseases such as cancer, hemophilia,
| |
| | if we agree for the sake of argument it
|
| Down's syndrome, cystic fibrosis,
| |
| | is possible to produce complex healthy
|
| color-blindness, and muscular dystrophy,
| |
| | ones at all).Ironically, the only way you
|
| not to mention severe deformities in
| |
| | can even entertain the notion that
|
| offspring.Darwinian evolution does not
| |
| | evolution was even possible is if you
|
| even begin to address the issue of how
| |
| | bring God into the equation. God
|
| organisms transformed from one species
| |
| | certainly could have laid down a
|
| into another on the genetic level. For
| |
| | blueprint in the genetic code (not unlike
|
| each accidental genetic improvement -- if
| |
| | that of a fetus, which "evolves" from one
|
| it truly was random -- there should have
| |
| | cell) that gives single-celled organisms
|
| been myriads of accidents which did not
| |
| | the ability to evolve into various
|
| work out. Many of these "failures" would
| |
| | species. And this would explain why the
|
| have resulted in diseased and deformed
| |
| | fossil records show relatively few
|
| life forms, regardless of how long they
| |
| | diseased and deformed life forms.Now, I
|
| lived or whether they lived at all. Thus,
| |
| | realize you can't bring God into a
|
| for every successful species -- and there
| |
| | science classroom; you can't
|
| have been literally billions of them --
| |
| | scientifically explain God. But shouldn't
|
| there should have been many unsuccessful
| |
| | you be able to scientifically explain
|
| ones littering our planet. The fossil
| |
| | evolution? And if after over one hundred
|
| records show no such scenario.Fossil
| |
| | years you still can't, isn't it time to
|
| records show, by and large, healthy life
| |
| | reconsider? Simply because it's accepted
|
| forms. The absence of a prolific number
| |
| | for a long period of time doesn't turn a
|
| of deformed and diseased life forms
| |
| | theory into a fact. In a science
|
| actually supports the notion that a
| |
| | classroom they should teach science, not
|
| random evolutionary process -- the one
| |
| | one person's religion or another person's
|
| taught in school text books -- never took
| |
| | cult.by Josh Greenberger
|
| place.I have yet to hear a biologist,
| |
| | Get his free book on evolution at
|
| geneticist or biophysicist explain how
| |
| | EvolutionDead.
|
